The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: Critique of the Adaptationist Programme

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”adssa” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]
Order Details
Philosophy paper
Article: The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme Outline the paper before starting. Get ideas clear and concise manner. 2 pages double space. You?re going to be both voices in the article. State something/and argue it. So know someone else?s argue back to your statement. There should be three paragraphs total. IN FIRST PARAGRAPH your paper will be on one reason/argument the author states in the paper (argument you will object to in paragraph 2) argument is usually one or 2 paragraphs of the articles you read. Define allscientific terms an average reader might not understand. You should be citing your article that you pick. IN SECOND PARAGRAPH you give ONE objection against the argument. Second paragraph has to be all you so no outside sources needed. Try real hard on objection sometimes takes many objections to find the strong objection. IN THIRD PARAGRAPH you would state the response the author would have on your objection in paragraph two. Paragraph 1 and 2 has to be all you. You will really be graded on 1 &2. Make sure to stay on topic.
Paragraph 1 = don?t forget terminology here. Citations only here. Cite whatever format you want. In your own words tell the articles argument/point. 2 or 3 citations here. Don?t over cite.
Paragraph 2 = understand enough to talk about it.
Paragraph 3 = thought about the objection
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”best” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]