The principles of social policy-'By emphasizing collective rights, the welfare state has undermined family responsibilities'. Discuss

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”adssa” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]

PayPal Acceptance Mark


Order Details
Question:
‘By emphasizing collective rights, the welfare state has undermined family responsibilities’. Discuss
Key words: welfare state, collective rights, undermine, family responsibilities.
Request:
-Make sure you read each question carefully and be sure you understand exactly what the question is asking. If you find the question at first unclear, email me before answering.
-You need to main focus on Australia Social Policy to discuss in the essay or you can make a comparison between Australia Policy and another country’s policy to answering ‘collective rights’, ‘family responsibilities’.
-Should include: A brief introduction and conclusion
Introduction: An introduction should explicitly state your answer and the organisation of the essay,
-The first is that… (the key point)
-The second main way that…(the key point)
-This essay will discuss two/three points above…the purpose…
It is NOT about giving away all of your great ideas – but it is about signposting for your reader that there is a purpose, a plan, a trajectory to the essay they are about to read.
Body: (you may use subheading): should be organized around a central point
-To discuss your key points in the introduction (Make sure you structure the body of the essay as you indicated in your introduction)
-Using case of studyin Australia (or comparison between Australia and another country) to approve your point of view.
Conclusion
-Re-answer the question and refer briefly to the main points in the body. Show HOW you have answered the question. Try not to repeat your conclusion verbatim. Example, “In conclusion, this it is argued in this essay that…
Important:
-Choose enough scholarly references so that you demonstrate an engagement with the field/issues and independent research.
-Think about the order of your points – which signals the development of discussion.
-Simplicity in structure is best, achieving clarity
Don’t be convoluted or verbose.
-Demonstrate that you have researched the relevant legal instruments/know what they are and mean if they are of relevance
References
-Most of the References are required of using my attachment. (If you find some useful resources, you can add them into the essay)
-You definitly HAVE TO follow the Harvard reference style that I’ve attached.
Overall what you need to care about:
Expression and sentence structure
Grammar
Structure of your argument
Referencing
Research resources
Presentation
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”best” metadata=”height: 126, width: 630″]

PayPal Acceptance Mark