This is the question that needs to be answered:
Different types of views dispute the natural law claim that evil law is not law. Choose a critique from the reading (Austin, Hart and Holmes all have some critiques) or find one in the literature, and assess its merits: Does the argument work to disprove the claim that bad law is not law? Does it have some flaw or weakness? Can the view be amended to accommodate the criticism?
YOU CAN ALSO PLACE OTHER SIMILAR ORDERS ON OUR WEBSITE AND GET AMAZING DISCOUNTS!!!