Compare and contrast the views of Tylor-Frazer, Marx-Freud, and Durkheim-Geertz on the nature and role of religion in human life. Specifically, your answer should include: 1. What are their views of the nature of religion? 2. How they see the role of religion in human life in the past and in the present? 3. Which of the pair of views, if any, sees religion in the most positive light? And finally, 4. Which is the interpretation of religion from the three pairs that you most favor or identify with (if you disagree with all three views, then say why you find their interpretation inadequate)?